Fragmentary ?list
created: Transcription (Reynolds).
source date: Probably first century BCE to first century CE
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: Creative Commons licence Attribution UK 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/) All reuse or distribution of this work must contain somewhere a link back to the URL http://inslib.kcl.ac.uk/

Bibliography

[...], 41.

Text

[...] α[...] β[...] τ[...] [...] ε[...] ν[...] ε[...] Βαρκαιo[...] χρ[...] αρ[...] π[...] ρε[...] απ[...] κα[...] [...]

Translation

[Not usefully translatable.]

Commentary

Kraeling, who wrongly read ΒΑϹ in line 7, possibly indicating βασ[ιλεύς, suggested that the panel might have recorded the texts of royal edicts or letters. It is possible that it contained a formal document or documents; but the layout suggests strongly that lines 7 ff. contained a list of names - so that it was perhaps an ephebic document, with preamble in lines 1-6 and the list following after a gap. It is probably to be associated with the many fragments of ephebic texts found in the baths, P.178 to P.198