Fragmentary decree or ruling
created: Transcription (Reynolds).
source date: First century BCE to Augustan
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: Creative Commons licence Attribution UK 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/) All reuse or distribution of this work must contain somewhere a link back to the URL http://inslib.kcl.ac.uk/

Bibliography

[...], 8 pl. XVf, whence [...] 20.766, [...] 324519, mentioned [...], 1964.592

[...] [...]δι[...] Ἰτθαννύρου [...] οὗ ἐστιν ἡ τιμή [...]ροντα ὅ ἐστιν [...] καὶ χωρίον Διοκλ[...]θης ὃ καλεῖται [...] Ἀλεξάνδρωι Νουμηνίου [...] κ[...] [...]

[^a1: at 3: ΗΤΙΙ [τιμή suggested by M.N. Tod in a letter.]]

Translation

. . . of It]thannyras [ . ? . ] the ?value of which is [ . ? . -]ronta which is [ . ? .] and the place [?land] [?of] Diokl[es? . . . -]thes which is called [ . . . ]. For Alexandros son of Noume[nios . . .

Commentary

The fragment very probably from the Greek version of the Latin text P.100, which it resembles both in the quality of marble used, to some extent in the style and mannerisms of its letters, and in the layout of its text. The subject in both seems to be the definition of plots of land and perhaps their allocation to colonists (c.f. the dative in 1.7 ); see further the commentary on P.100.

Line 2: For Ἰτθαννύρας we now have many examples; there is no convincing evidence for the name Θαννύρας (as suggested in 1962). But it was mistaken in 1962 to suggest that he was among the recipients, since he is apparently only named as the owner of a territory adjoing the one(s) being described.