Fragmentary list of priests of Apollo
created: Publications (Reynolds).
source date: Probably second century CE
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: Creative Commons licence Attribution UK 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/) All reuse or distribution of this work must contain somewhere a link back to the URL http://inslib.kcl.ac.uk/

Bibliography

[...], 10, p. 112, and pl. 80, whence [...], 70bis p. 258, on which [...], 1964.562

[...] Μᾶρκοϲ Κ[...]ιοι [...] Ἀγχαρῆνοϲ Ι[...] Πόπλιοϲ Κλαύδιοϲ Τορκο[...] ἡ πόλιϲ Τίτοϲ Φλάβιοϲ Βαρκαῖοϲ ἡ πόλιϲ Τίτος Φλάβιοϲ Ἀγχίϲτρατοϲ Μᾶρκοϲ Οὔλπιοϲ Ἀριϲ[...] Δέγμοϲ Καϲκέλλιοϲ [...] Τιβέριοϲ Κλαύδιοϲ Βάττοϲ Φιλίππου υἱόϲ

Apparatus

Translations

. . . ] M(arkos) M(arcus) K[- . . . ] Ancharenos [ . . . ]; P(oplios) Klaudios Torko[?uatos] P(ublius) Claudius Torquatus; the City; T(itos) Phlabios T(itus) Flavius Barkaios; the City; T(itos) Phlabios T(itus) Flavius Anchistratos; M(arkos) Oulpios M(arcus) Ulpius Aris[- . . ]; Degmos Kaskellios D; Ti(berios) Klaudios Ti(berius) Claudius Bat[tos ? son of] Philippos [ . . .

Commentary

Oliverio saw a similarity in hand to C.414

All details and text are taken from Smith and Porcher. It seems clear that the list is a running record of eponymous priests of Apollo (so Robert, loc. cit.).

Line 3: Possibly Τορκο[υᾶτος], but the name is not otherwise attested at Cyrene. A misreading for Βαρκαῖος is conceivable.

Lines 4, 6: It appears that on two occasion there was no suitable candidate for the eponymous priesthood and that the city corporately undertook the expense.

Line 8: The cognomen was perhaps Ἀρισ[τ-]. Almost certainly to be connected with the one of two D. Kaskellioi Aristoteleis (LGPN nos. V1-63184, 63185) of C.250, lines 2-4, dated under Commodus, one of whom appears also in C.256.

Line 10: Battos: Almost certainly to be identified with the priest Ti.Claudius Battos of C.299, lines 5, 6 and C.221 lines 7,8, C.305, line 4 both probably to be dated under Marcus Aurelius. The name in the next line, being inset, is likely to be his father's rather than a new entry; if that is so it is possible that he is son of Philippos responsible for Apollo's columns, see C.257.